|
Headline News What's New |
Tools:   |
|
June 5 - 8, 2008 SVS Annual Meeting! Come and meet us at booth 814 of The SVS Annual Meeting June 5 - 8, 2008 at the San Diego Convention Center, San Diego, CA. We are going to showcase our complete suite of cardiovascular products including VascuBase™, VascuPro™, EkoPro™ with our comprehesnive outcome analysis tools. Do not miss the show!
Long waited technical support website has been launched. Consenus Medical Systems, Inc. technical support website provides you with new exiting features like online email support ticket system, live chat with our technical support team, forums where you can read an post questions or answers regarding our software suite, FAQ's and much more. Below is a brief explanation on how to use our new technical support website. Technical Support Website is based on the membership login system. Each client needs to register with the support website based on unique access key code that is delivered to the clients via email. Steps for using the Technical Support website Upon receipt of the access key code, clients should go and register with Consensus Medical Systems, Inc. technical support website. http://support.consensusmed.net Clients should follow the menu bar “Register” by typing in the key code sent by Consensus Medical Systems, Inc. Please complete the registration form as accurate as possible. Upon successful completion of the registration process, the client would be notified via email by an auto respond email with his/her account information details provided in the registration form.  To take advantage of our online support system, clients must login using our technical support features i.e. E-mail Support (ticket system), Live Chat with Consensus Medical Systems, Inc. employees, Forums, FAQ’s as well as all documentation available for our line of products. Using the Email Support Application (ticket system) Clients should submit their issues with our products via this application, the form is fairly easy to use.  Once logged in, clients would be redirect to the main page of his/her account information. On the left hand of the page under “Directory” column the user would find several links related to his/her account, i.e. “Change Username, Change Password, Account Details, Issued Tickets, New Ticket” To issue a ticket the user would click the link “New Ticket”, then fill the form. After completion, an email with the ticket number of his/her issue. Our support team would answer to these tickets online through our internal application. Each time an answer was sent by the support team, the client would be notified via email with the possibility of viewing and responding back to our customer support from within the technical support website after login process. Once the ticket was closed by us, the client can view it but can not reply to it, in order to reply with the same issue (if the client considers that the bug was not fixed), he or she must start a new ticket. The fixing (time wise) of all the issues depending on the “Problem’s Level” categories posted on our support website.  Using the Live On Line Support (chat system) Once the client is logged in to the support website, he/she can access the chat system. The chat system is a one way pipe, meaning that just our clients can invite our staff for chatting and not vice-versa. When an invitation was submitted from a client, the staff would be notified visually in the chat panel, CMS staff can accept or deny the invitation. Also on the chat panel the staff can choose his/her status i.e. online, busy, at lunch …etc.  Using the Forums Application Clients can post messages, reply to messages or can open new forum categories. We encourage that all clients visit the Forum System, in which they can find answers to questions from other collogues or other clients using our products. The forum is moderated by our staff, responding frequently to the client questions. All the posts are visible for anyone with a valid CMS account ID.
VascuBase™in the Literatures! VascuBase™ Features & Benefits VascuBase™ is a great tool for outcome analysis and research in vascular surgery and endovascular interventions. Several institutes in North America and Europe have successfuly utilized VascuBase™ and referenced it in their publications. The following is a random sample of publications that referenced VascuBase™: - Correlation of Cerebral Oximetry Measurement with Carotid Artery Stump Pressures During Carotid Endarterectomy.
Eugene S. Lee, Dean L. Melnyk, Michael A. Kuskowski and Steven M. Santilli . Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 34, No. 5, 403-409 (2000) DOI: 10.1177/153857440003400504 http://ves.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/34/5/403  -
Pitfalls in Achieving the Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative (DOQI) Guidelines for Hemodialysis Access? James K. Fullerton, Robert B. McLafferty, Don E. Ramsey, Maurice S. Solis, Laura A. Gruneiro, Kim J. Hodgson. Annals of Vascular Surgery: Volume 16, Number 5 / October, 2002, pp 613-617 : , pp 613-617 : , pp 613-617 Springer Link Jurnal Article - Endovascular Stent Graft Repair of Abdominal and Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms. A Ten-Year Experience With 817 Patients.
Michael L. Marin, Larry H. Hollier, Sharif H. Ellozy et al. Ann Surg. 2003 October; 238(4): 586-595. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000090473.63393.e9 http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1360117  -
Revascularization and Quality of Life for Patients with Limb-threatening Ischemia Alexander S. Tretinyak , Eugene S. Lee , Michael A. Kuskowski , Michael P. Caldwell , Steven M. Santilli . Annals of Vascular Surgery: Volume 15, Number 1 / January, 2001 http://www.springerlink.com/index/Y0QY5KLTBQ39GKPT.pdf  - Major Lower Extremity Amputation in an Academic Vascular Center.
Ahmed M. Abou-Zamzam, Theodore H. Teruya, J. David Killeen, Jeffrey L. Ballard. Annals of Vascular Surgery; Volume 17, Number 1 / February, 2003 http://www.springerlink.com/index/LUCJC5RKG52K0FEU.pdf  - The Fate of a Patent Carotid Artery Contralateral to an Occlusion.
Matthew L. Brengman, Sean D. O'Donnell, Phillip Mullenix, James M. Goff, David L. Gillespie, Norman M. Rich. Annals of Vascular Surgery; Volume 14, Number 1 / January, 2000 Springer Link Journal Article - Subintimal angioplasty as a primary modality in the management of critical limb ischemia: comparison to bypass grafting for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal occlusive disease.
Hynes N, Akhtar Y, Manning B, Aremu M, Oiakhinan K, Courtney D, Sultan S; J Endovasc Ther. 2004 Aug;11(4):460-71 View Articles  - J Vasc Surg. 2006 Mar;43(3):504-512
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages 504-512.e2 (March 2006) Two-year outcome with preferential use of infrainguinal angioplasty for critical ischemia Presented at the Vascular Surgical Society of Great Britain and Ireland, 2003, Glasgow, Scotland, and the Association of International Vascular Surgeons (AVIS), 2004, Snowmass, Colorado. Syed N. Haider (FRCS (I)), Eamon G. Kavanagh, MD, Martin Forlee, FCS (SA), Mary P. Colgan, MD, Prakash Madhavan (FRCS (Ed)), Dermot J. Moore, MD, Gregor D. Shanik, MD Received 25 August 2005; accepted 6 November 2005 Objective Infrainguinal angioplasty provides a minimally invasive alternative to bypass surgery in patients with critical ischemia. This study aimed to determine the 2-year patency, limb salvage, and survival rates in patients who underwent infrainguinal angioplasty in a unit where angioplasty is used preferentially whenever possible for critical ischemia. Methods A total of 333 consecutive patients who presented with rest pain, tissue loss, or both and who underwent an infrainguinal intervention in the 4-year period between January 1998 and January 2002 were divided into femoropopliteal and femorodistal groups. The TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus angiogram scoring system was used to classify the lesions. Angioplasty was the preferred procedure in all patients for whom a stump or portion of a superficial femoral artery was patent. Exclusion criteria included the concomitant or sequential treatment of iliac lesions. Patients were followed up after surgery with ankle-brachial indices and duplex ultrasonography. Results A total of 180 patients underwent 198 angioplasties. Primary cumulative patency, limb salvage, and survival for femoropopliteal angioplasty (n = 166) at 2 years were 75%, 90%, and 88%, respectively, and 60%, 76%, and 82% for infrapopliteal angioplasty (n = 32). At 30 days, mortality was 2.7%, and the complication rate was 8.3%. There was a restenosis rate (>50%) of 68% and 65% at 2 years for the femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal angioplasty groups, respectively. Seven patients required repeat angioplasty of the same site, 30 underwent subsequent bypass, and 16 of 43 occluded limbs were amputated. A total of 153 comparative control patients underwent 162 bypass procedures during the same period. Primary cumulative patency, limb salvage, and survival for femoropopliteal bypass (n = 80) at 2 years were 69%, 87%, and 76%, respectively, and were 53%, 57%, and 64% for infrapopliteal bypass (n = 82). The 30-day mortality for bypass was 5.2%, the complication rate was 35%, and 31 limbs were amputated. Conclusions The results of this study on the intermediate-term outcome of angioplasty suggest that angioplasty, when used preferentially for critical ischemia, in anatomically suitable patients provides very acceptable limb salvage and survival despite a relatively high restenosis rate. - Open surgical repair of children less than 13 years old with lower extremity vascular injury
Michael C. Dalsing, MD, Dolores F. Cikrit, MD, and Alan P. Sawchuk, MD, Indianapolis, Ind Purpose: We sought to review the diagnosis and treatment of children with lower extremity vascular injury. Methods: We performed a query of our vascular surgery database from 1996 through 2002 to determine those with lower extremity vascular injuries requiring surgery who were also less than 13 years of age. Patient demographics, presentation, cause, surgical specifics, and outcome were sought. Results: Six children (2 girls and 4 boys) with an average age of 6.8 years (range, 2-9 years) were found. The causes were 3 blunt injuries, 2 iatrogenic injuries, and 1 penetrating injury. Associated injuries were common. There were 3 femoral and 3 popliteal artery injuries. Two were pseudoaneurysms (common femoral and popliteal artery), and 4 were acute occlusions, of which 3 experienced a delay in diagnosis. There was one primary below-knee amputation. Four reverse vein bypasses were performed, and one vein patch repair of a pseudoaneurysm was performed. Generally, 7 to 9 O interrupted Prolene (Ethicon, Inc, Somerville, NJ) repairs were performed. A delay in diagnosis (2 blunt injuries) resulted in 2 major amputations and 1 insensate foot. Four reconstructions are functioning with viable limbs (follow-up, 5-49 months). An associated brain injury resulted in the only death. Conclusions: Vascular blunt injury is especially insidious in children. However, an aggressive approach of vascular repair, even extensive bypasses with reverse vein, will allow limb salvage in the absence of a diagnostic delay. ( J Vasc Surg 2005; 41:983-7.)
|
|